![](/rp/kFAqShRrnkQMbH6NYLBYoJ3lq9s.png)
Theoretically speaking, how powerful of a bomb could humans
2012年2月19日 · Tsar Bomba was a multi-stage fusion device, which used the early x-ray products from a central, conventional hydrogen bomb to trigger additional fusion stages surrounded it. The magnitude of this bomb would have only been limited by the practical expediency of getting it aboard a plane.
Did the tsar bomb have any affect on earths orbit? : r/askscience
2012年2月8日 · The Tsar bomb did not effect either of those things, as it was contained within the earths atmosphere (which is coupled to the earth). It did not remove any material from the planet, and neither did it redistribute any significant amount of material any significant distance.
Has there ever been a stronger weapon/bomb created than a …
No one has ever claimed to have built a weapon larger than the Tsar Bomba.. In the US, there were investigations into Tsar-bomba sized weapons (100-150 Mt) and even studies into whether significantly larger weapons could be produced — e.g., …
What are the differences between Chernobyl, the Tsar Bomba and …
2019年6月15日 · TL;DR: Tsar Bomba was by far the least radioactive of the examples given, and released remarkably little ionizing radiation into the environment compared to most other atmospheric nuclear tests. Since OP also asked about Tsar Bomba, it was by far the least radioactive of the three examples OP gave, certainly far less radioactive than the first ...
TIL Tsar Bomba, the most powerful nuclear weapon ever ... - Reddit
2013年10月16日 · The TSAR bomba, at maximum rating is a 100 megaton air dropped bomb, that is fucking terrifying. At the time, the biggest US detonation was a ground detonated 15 megaton explosion at Bikini Atoll. This was a 50 megaton war head that was air dropped, and is still the largest man made nuclear explosion.
TIL the Tsar Bomba, the single most physically powerful device …
2015年7月19日 · The Tsar Bomba was a three-stage lithium bomb with Trutnev-Babaev [6] second and third stage design,[7] with a yield of 50 to 58megatons of TNT (210 to 240 PJ).[8]
Why didn't the Soviets mass produce the Tsar Bomba?
2014年1月6日 · That was their largest yield weapon ever, the Mk-41, which managed to squeeze 25 Mt of yield (half of the tested Tsar Bomba) in a bomb that "only" weighed 10,600 lbs (just a little more than the Fat Man bomb dropped on Nagasaki). The 100 Mt Tsar Bomba had a yield-to-weight ratio of only about 3.4 kilotons/kilogram.
Why was the "Tsar Bomba" named as such? Wouldn't such a name …
2014年6月30日 · The only derogatory (in some sense) instance I've came across was a running joke in the 1900's that "in Russia there are Tsar-kolokol (bell), Tsar-pushka (cannon) and Tsar-tryapka(doormat)", the latter being a reference to the spinelessness of Nikolai II. The word also emphasizes uniqueness of the object, i.e. the biggest and one of a kind.
ELI5:Why arent tsar bombs being made anymore? : r ... - Reddit
2014年7月5日 · Hence, Tsar Bomba, a bomb so big that the ICBM designed for it (which evolved into the Proton rocket) is classed as a heavy-lift rocket. As the decade progressed, Soviet rocketry got more accurate, submarine-based missiles became possible, and the MIRV was invented, rendering the Tsar Bomba obsolete.
Can These Characters survive the Tsar Bomba? : r/whowouldwin
2021年7月30日 · Tsar bomba actually reached peak 300 million degrees celcius, which will definitely kill Thanos. I find that scaling the powers are often inconsistent, thus we just go by normal physics. Thor would also get vaporised.